Dammit Jim I’m…wait what am I?

Readers! Hello. It’s been a long time since I’ve written anything on here and, to be honest, I’m pretty nervous about this post.

It’s been a tricky one to write this, mainly because I hate the thought that it might come across as whiney or self-indulged in some way. But a little gentle nudging from friends and family has pushed this out into the world, predominantly in the hope that someone else might find some comfort or support in the content.

If it’s necessary, please note that this post deals with depression and associated issues, so it’s not exactly a laugh a minute and some people might find it unpleasant.

So how to start?

 

I’m not crazy. I’m not.

Hi reader. I’m BloggerNotADoctor:  I’m 30 this year. (That’s the trigger right there- 3 decades- it’s not a lot, but enough to supposedly have a few things figured out.) I have a beautiful wife, a wired Jack Russel Terrier, a mortgage on a 3-bedroom house in a small midlands (UK) town and I’m very close to my family geographically and emotionally. We don’t struggle with money, partly because of my wife’s salary and partly because I’m tighter than a gnat’s bum. I can play (and I own) several instruments, I have both a B.A(hons) and M.A. degree and I have a full time, permanent job. But despite all of this I wake up every day feeling like I’m a total failure.

 

And there you have it: the strangest paragraph I’ve ever had to write, or more specifically, come to terms with writing. It’s hard to look at all the things you have and not feel incredibly selfish for not feeling as happy as you think you should be. So I’m writing this, partly to come to terms with it, and partly to see if I can work out where to go from here. This is catharsis in its most traditional form, thanks for bearing with me.

If I’m going to address this, I guess I have to start at the very beginning.

Image result for a very good place to start

Its a very good place to start.

That, dear reader, is more complicated than it sounds. You see I could talk about how the education system in the UK when I was growing up programmed my generation with the notion that ‘able’ students are only successful of they go to university. I could talk about how my English teacher in 6th form reacted with utter disdain when my university of choice turned out not to be a member of the Russell group (a bit like the ivy league for our US cousins) but instead an ex polytechnic college (that happens to be consistently ranked amongst the top new universities globally, but that’s another story). I could talk at length over how my undergraduate course was the greatest years of my life and inspired me to want to learn as much as I could, how the loss of my Granddad in 1st year hit me harder than I realised at the time or how my postgraduate course was so intense- and its students so dismissive of my alma-mater-  that I suffered from a largely undetected breakdown that was spotted far too late. All of these things were stepping stones to now, but I have neither the emotional fortitude or the time to go into them here.

 

 

The best place to start is by saying what was missing in my first paragraph. I refer you to the title of this blog, specifically the part that informs you that I am, in the most concrete of ways, ‘not a doctor’.

Image result for dammit jim

 

You see, I should be. Jeesh How whiney and self-indulged does that come across? If you’re sat there thinking ‘bully for you mate, I should be a millionaire/professional footballer/rock star/president/CEO’ then thank you very much. Thank you for being the perfect example of the thought process that leads you to consider yourself as ungrateful or unworthy or think that you should be ashamed of how you feel. It’s not your fault you had that reaction to me throwing my toys out of the pram and whining about not getting my PhD, and I don’t think any less of you. I really don’t, simply because I went through exactly the same set of thoughts. It’s that conflict that is leaving its mark on all of the other wonderful things in my life. And I would seriously love to be done hating myself for it now.

Let me elaborate. I was doing a PhD. I shan’t be telling you where or with whom, but I shall be telling you the basics. My degree is in English Literature and my Masters was in Modern and Contemporary Literature and Culture. I passed my MA by a measly one mark after spending 6 months sat at a keyboard in tears unable to write a damn thing.

Image result for writers block

Like this. If instead of a block it was a crippling fear of failure and an overwhelming sense of inadequacy. And without the imaginary tiger.

 

 

My major passion lies in the evolution of literature and hypothesising about where the future might lie. I look at the weird things, the odd corners of the literary landscape in which lie the books written backward/with holes in/ upside down/graphic novels/text-based adventure games/digital literature etc. etc. etc. There are only a couple of places that would be able to support postgraduate research, and I got a place at one of them. My painfully poor master’s degree mark alas made me (narrowly) miss out on a scholarship, so I funded it with a government-backed bank loan called a PCDL. This was for £10,000.  This loan would cover my tuition fees, but it would not enable me to do other luxuries besides study, such as eat and sleep under a roof. So my aforementioned amazing family stepped in and I lodged with my parents for the duration of my studies. To bring in enough money to travel to Uni and buy books, I did some temporary work as what is known as a Cover Supervisor. A clever position invented so that schools could employ staff to cover for absent colleagues without a teaching qualification, thus making them cheaper than a fully qualified teacher (More on that later). I also did some work for the university, but as a member of teaching staff and in the design and implementation of peer support networks within the department. As you can probably guess, education is something I’m very passionate about.

 

 

 

If that seems like a bit too much information, let me assure you it’s all relevant to understanding where I am now and how the hell I got here.

Fast forward a couple of years to the end of the second year of my PhD and the brown smelly substance hit the bladed whirly thing at great velocity. I won’t go into very much detail, but you’ll get the basic facts:

  • My supervisor left the university rather quickly and didn’t really inform me of the fact and also had not scheduled my annual review. Ever.
  • My first annual review was 6 months late and at that time my second supervisor had become my first supervisor. A new member of staff became my second.
  • The review panel decided that a lack of supervision had led to my project being ‘well written but unoriginal’ and I was forced to reconsider the direction of my research
  • My second annual review is scheduled on time giving me 6 months to re-write the entirety of my thesis to the new direction
  • At the second review I am informed that he project is interesting and original but that I will not be able to finish it on time if it to be good enough.
  • Also the university will not be able to fund any extension to my studies.

Image result for that went well

What to take from this: I’m £10,000 in debt by this point. University is saying I need at least one more year, by which time I must start paying back the PCDL loan. Poor supervision and management lead me to needing an extension, but despite this being the universities fault they were unwilling to provide me the financial means to finish the course. So I’m 2 years into a 3 year course with half of my thesis written and I’m forced through no fault of my own to abandon my course with no qualification, a gap on my CV and a £10k debt. Needless to say I involved my student’s union who fought hard during a lengthy tribunal resulting in the university accepting fault for the first 18 months of my course and refunding me for this time only. It’s very hard during all of this to not feel like I was simply a cash piñata for the institution all along. With no monitoring of my supervision and no compassion regarding my situation shown at all. To an institution which had devoted considerable time and effort into working for and improving (don’t forget the peer support project they were in talks about rolling out across more departments!) I have no value save the money that I have managed to secure through personal hardship and significant debt.

 

 

It’s a great boost to a chap’s confidence I can tell you.

 

So what’s a guy to do? Remember the cover supervisor gig? The bit of pocket money I needed to get by on? That. That’s it. That’s all I have. My CV reads studied, qualified, studied, qualified, studied and did a bit of part time work, carried on doing a bit of part time work. Thankfully, a school for which I did a lot of cover was looking to employ a cover supervisor full time and here I am: 2 and a bit years later, pushing 30 with 2 degrees earning approximately £12.5k (about $16k USD, give-or-take), just over half as much as my wife and nearly a third of my best friend.

Now I know money isn’t everything, and I’m certainly not enough of a troglodyte to believe a man must earn more than a woman. I’m so phenomenally proud of all my wife has accomplished and continues to accomplish and have nothing but respect and admiration for the bestie, who never went to university but is one of the most successful men I know. And therein lies the rub. All of the time, money and effort invested in chasing these qualifications to become BloggerNotADoctor B.A.(hons) M.A. to earn very little and work in an environment I hate. Its soul destroying  to think that I have, in all honesty, wasted a decade of my life chasing a dream that I will now never likely realise that to the emotional and financial detriment all of the other elements of my life.

 

You see education in this country is broken. Not only are we still pushing an outdated and dangerous notion that success is quantifiable; that if you have certain grades or go to certain seats of learning it increases your value to society, but we are doing so to the emotional and social detriment of children. I know first-hand, I see it happening every day. Teachers should be able to inspire, to encourage, to develop their students into leaving school as well-rounded, productive, active and engaged members of society and to have to broadest skill set they can in order to apply them to wherever they want to go. Instead we have them take their options, choices of subject that define their entire trajectory, at 13. Christ when I was 13 I couldn’t decide what to eat for breakfast let alone what I want to do for…well…ever. Teachers aren’t allowed to engage and inspire, no; they must test and re-test. Children are too painfully aware of the fact that must hit targets and achieve pre-determined grades based on numerous tests that we have students suffering from mental breakdowns and stress related illnesses at as young as 10. Teachers are pulling 60-70 hour weeks and constantly monitored. Their pay (which has been frozen for at least the last 10 years) is related directly to their ability to push kids harder and force them to hit bigger and more insane targets. And all the time the most vulnerable, least academic children are made, unconsciously on the part of the system I will admit, to feel second class.

I tried teaching. I had responsibility for 3 classes as an –unqualified instructor’ last year and it was hell. I didn’t have a weekend off for 6 months. I lived, ate, breathed and defecated statistics and targets. Despite feeling like a glorified administrator, the kids enjoyed my lessons and I felt like every now and then I got through, I inspired them. So much so that I enquired about getting qualified. I found a course that would have me qualified in 3 months-  a fraction of the usual time – based on my experience in the classroom over the last 6 years. It would cost £4,500. See above for how affordable you think that is. But knowing the school needed staff in my department, and that male English teachers are somewhat rare, I gathered my evidence and paperwork and submitted them to the school and suggested that I could continue my role as a UQT (earning, £5k less than the next, most newly qualified teacher) and train on this course if the school would pay for it, offering I might add to take the £4,500 fee as a pay cut.

The answer was no.

No to a teacher who already knows the kids. No to a teacher who is settled in the department. No to a teacher with 2 degrees. No to a teacher with experience of teaching at the highest level possible. No to a teacher who is willing to be paid less than their worth to provide all of this because they genuinely care about the students. And it’s here that we meet. You, a reader with a passing interest in mental health and education and me, A former higher education cash piñata turned school doormat with two very, very expensive pieces of paper gathering dust atop his bookshelf.

Related image

“And this kids, is why you can’t have nice things…”

 

This is the crux of the problem with education in the UK: it thrives on failure. Over everything else, the overwhelming mentality of those at the upper echelons of the education system is one that actively encourages feelings of overwhelming failure. We constantly assess to move the goalposts because it would be too much for students to believe they are a success; no they must instead believe that they are not achieving what they should. And I choose my words carefully here. It isn’t they aren’t achieving what they could what we know they are capable of; but that they aren’t achieving what they should. what we are constantly told to do is push them harder and harder, move the goals further and further. Well you know what happens when you apply enough pressure to an object? Here’s a hint:

Image result for jackhammer pavement

And it’s not just the kids. The constant, unrelenting pressure of a system that is incapable of acknowledging success is causing teachers to leave in droves. If the kids are the pavement in that picture, the teachers are the tip of the jackhammer. And like any tool under constant strain, they soon wear out.

As both a product and a tool of this system, no wonder I’m a little bit broken.

‘Just Get Out!’ I hear you cry ‘Get a real job!’

Try it with my CV. Try applying for the private sector when the only experience you have is part-time supply teaching that graduated to full time cover work. Where your qualifications were so tailored to research that they are practically useless in any other sector. Where all of the jobs in field that involve writing copy or working with words are so saturated with graduates who have done their internships and worked in the real world. Where there are fully qualified teachers just as disillusioned as you applying for the same jobs with the added bonus of another very expensive piece of paper. Try averaging 15 applications a week and getting 1 interview in a 10-month period. Try desperately wanting to leave education and constantly getting offered nothing but education jobs and tell me to ‘just get out’ again.

Related image

 

My other great passions asides from TV and Film are playing music and woodworking. It’s therapeutic to make things and I’m told I do it really well. There’s a certain personal irony to taking bits of unwanted, valueless scrap and turning it into beautiful, functional and valued objects. I might even pop some on the blog soon.

Only thing is, I can’t even get an entry-level training post in either of those areas because I’m too old now. I’ve looked at training as a cabinet maker, and there are some lovely looking courses that will let you pay on a PCDL loan…

Image result for debt weight

I’ll just leave this here…

And you can put one of those weights in both hands if you want to set up on your own.

 

So Hi reader.

I’m BloggerNotADoctor. I’m 30 this year. I have a beautiful wife, a wired Jack Russell Terrier, a mortgage on a 3-bedroom house in a small midlands town and I’m very close to my family. I have never earned enough money to pay even a small amount from my student loan. I still owe £12k for my PhD fees despite never actually getting my PhD. I wasted my 20’s chasing an ideal sold to me by a broken system and then hypocritically ended up working in that self-same system selling the same broken ideals to the next generation.  I’ve been looking for a career change for the best part of a year now and I’ve had one interview. I wake up every morning feeling like a failure and I’m trying really hard to do something about it.

 

Thanks for reading.

J.

*disclaimer. In no way do I intend to insult, demean, belittle of demonise my amazing (second) primary PhD supervisor or seem ungrateful to my current employers for actually giving me a job. It’s the systems you work in that are abhorrent, not you.

 

The Shark Avoidance Parabola

Hey you guys! It’s been a while. I know that’s not really the done thing for a brand new blog, but there’s stuff going down that I wont bore you with requiring me to fill in a butt load of paperwork. But now that’s all done, I’m back baby! So what opinion am I going to mercilessly inflict upon the Internet this time? I’ve got some things to say about SHEILD, but it’s been too long since the finale for that to be relevant so I’ll store that up for a general Whedon post in the near future. Oooo and I’m off the Leicester ComicCon tomorrow, it’s pretty new on the convention circuit, so stay posted for a little review of that tucked into the next post.   But to the matter at hand, ladies and gentleman of the interwebs I give you:

The Shark Jumping Parabola: Why I’ve had it with The Big Bang Theory.

  What?!!! Yes. Suck it up and bear with me. It’s about time somebody pulled a Schrodinger on Lorre. And I mean that in the real, genuine sense of what Irwin Schrodinger was trying to do with his absurd hypothetical cat, before people thought he was just making up a zombie for the sake of t-shirt sales and moronic misquoting.   I, like pretty much everyone else with a television and a vague pub-quiz level working knowledge of science and pop-culture, was a pretty big fan of TBBT. Chuck Lorre hit the nail on the head with his combination of awkward geeks fawning after hot blonde waitresses, and there are few who can deny the massive success of Dr. Sheldon Cooper.   But is this a formula that was ever built with longevity in mind?   The initial awkward tension between Leonard and Penny was good fun, geeks across the land were instantly able to relate to the unrealistic pining of Leonard and I’m sure there are plenty of pretty girls out there who are pretty used to having that kind of…attention/creepy stalker nerds.   But asides from these obviously flawed characters (I’ll get to that in a moment), there’s one thing that this premise lacks- staying power. There’s no way anyone is going to watch a show that runs for as long as Friends (the international sitcom gold standard) where the romantic interest is all one sided. For one thing, it’s boring as hell, any good sitcom needs to grow and progress (even if you pull a How I Met Your Mother and ignore all that development in a 15 minute montage). 6 years in and still have geeky old Leonard lusting after ditsy old Penny would be…well…creepy! We’d be telling the obsessive stalker to move on lest we inform the authorities.   So how has Lorre and Co. resolved this? A Leonard and Penny romance. Now yes, this is what everyone wanted to see. Beauty and the Geek together in a mismatched odd couple for the science age. Awesome. But is it?   The driving force behind the show: socially awkward geek, sleep-around penny how will they resolve their flaws is…well… resolved. So how can we go any further?   In fact, all of the characters are pretty much resolved: Wollowitz isn’t a pervert now he’s married to the normalising influence of Bernie. Sheldon is slowly being transformed into a ‘normal character’ with the addition of a normalising influence in Amy. Raj is still awkward because he is the show’s only unfinished character, and even he is occasionally normalised by the presence of Stuart.   Lorre seems to imply that all of these characters need to be ‘fixed’ in some way. And, Lorre being Lorre, that way seems to be finding a pretty girl and getting laid.   Oooo. How witty and clever this comedy is.     Lets look at the two leads:   Leonard Hofstadter. He’s a comic book nerd, a science geek, an underappreciated child downtrodden by an overbearing mother with hardly any social skills and nigh-on crippling allergies.   In reality he’d look like this: comic_relief_rorySmall And probably end up like this

Every boy loves his mother...

Every boy loves his mother…

Penny ????. She’s an aspiring actress/ full time waitress, generally regarded as very attractive, occasionally a bit of a tomboy, with a wine dependency and a penchant for casual sex with morons. So…   MTE5NTU2MzE2MzIyMTA0ODQz     But instead we get these two actors:   kaley-and-johnny-leonard-penny-32278877-1030-1280       These are not representative of their characters. They are, at best, aspirations. The nerd is boyishly handsome, the hot waitress is a pretty girl-next-door type.   Lorre and Co.’s message, even before the characters open their mouths, is that these characters are only valuable and interesting when they are attractive.   Seriously, look at the whole cast pre-wardrobe.   images     Now I know Lorre is playing on a fantasy. But it’s a fantasy based on horrible, horrible stereotypes and cultural ‘norms’.   Lorre is no stranger to objectifying women, his female characters have traditionally had all the depth of a puddle and acted as nothing more that the object of male desire and/or scorn. See 2.5 Men.   This is a common criticism of his work and I’m not going to dwell. What I will do is say how fed up, I been how genuinely sick to the back teeth I am of Lorre’s god-awful characatures.   You see, all he has done is take essence of geek, the vaguest, most superficial stereotypes and grafted them onto generic, lecherous males and misogynistic, objectified females in order to do something ‘different’. The result:

images-1

 

The one thing geeks, nerds, trekkies, dungeon masters, etc all had in common, the power that they had to cling to was that they possessed knowledge, be it knowledge of science, or the ability to quote every line of Star Trek: TOS. This knowledge is a badge of pride, an identifier that says, hey, I’m really passionate about what I do or what I love and that’s ok!

But instead of promoting unity in the vein of ‘You have sports and crappy TV comedies, I have less popular things, but we all have our passions so let’s get along’, What Lorre manages to do regularly and without fail in TBBT is subvert this knowledge, to take away the unique identifiers of one thing that a marginalised and oppressed subculture had. Star Trek is misquoted with reckless abandon, you can apparently loot corpses in TBBT Universe’s version of Word Of Warcraft…fucking Schrodinger’s Cat!!! (Do not get me started)

Even science is thrown around to produce cheap laughs masquerading as highbrow humour. Theories are distilled and simplified to the point of complete subversion for the viewer to feign some kind of identification with the scientists: ‘hahahaha I got that. Did you? No. Well you didn’t study logic 101 for 2 weeks baked off your face in freshman year…’

To paraphrase one redditor: Saying you get the science or the geek culture or science references is “Like saying you understand the law on Law and Order or the medicine on ER.”   It’s like the only way Lorre and Co can make science cool is by, well, taking the science out and turning it into a selection of witty one-liners to throw out at parties.

These characters are awful.   I have to privilege of being a grad student. I know researchers in such fields as quantum mechanics, particle physics, and cognitive neuroscience, game theory and cyber terrorism. You know what these guys are? Perfectly. God Damn. Normal. And the professors? The ones at the level of the ‘genius’ Sheldon Cooper? They’re too busy working on ground breaking research to be bothered about a regular comic book visit or the right kind of model train. Flipping it on it’s head, the true geeks, the comic book collectors and online gamers, the board game geeks and trekkies that I’ve had the genuine honour of knowing; they’re too busy working on their Dr Who fanfic projects or modding GTA to play as iron man to hold down a full time research position.

Lorre’s characters can’t have their cake and eat it. Either they are full time researchers doing groundbreaking science, or full time geeks expanding the realms of pop culture complete with mountain dew addiction and permanent Cheetos dye.   They can’t be both. It just doesn’t work.   In trying to represent these marginalized factions of society, Lorre fails miserably on both fronts. Geeks can’t identify with them, scientists can’t identify with them. It’s hard to watch TBBT without feeling like it’s just taking the piss.

To return to a redditor for backup: “When someone alerted me to the existence of the show, they tried to claim that it showed “nerds” in a positive light. It took me about 30 seconds to realize this was not true at all. It plays into all the exact same stereotypes about intelligent people that every other TV show has for the past 50 years. The only difference is that they constitute the majority of the cast instead of an extra side character.”

This is television for the internet age of Wikipedia. Where you don’t have to read all the marvel comics to know all of the Spiderman origin stories, where you can get all of your knowledge of physics from t-shirts and memes. Where your d&d dice are rolled by a computer and you nerds are created by a rich, popular misogynist with a very mean streak.

If you want a geek show, go and watch futurama. Seriously. The science in that is great and so subtle, you genuinely need to know it to get it. Or even try The I.T Crowd for a much better awkward geek than Dr. Cooper will ever be.

If you like the show and still laugh at it despite its total lack of new ideas, sure, go for it.

But for God’s sake stop telling me it’s ‘clever’ or ‘nerdy humor’.   It’s a bullying and oppressive dig aimed at the lowest common denominator. And, with the death of its brother show’s Misogynistic Casanovas over on 2.5 Men, maybe it’s time to but this one to bed too.

Why A Justice League Movie Can Never Work

Ok, lets get this party started. Heres a little blog I wrote for my friends comic book review site (links to follow, it’s in development) about the announcement of the next Batman /Superman film.

Enjoy.

Why A Justice League Movie Can Never Work (or How Marvel is better than DC.)

(Yeah. You heard me)

So, Zac Snyder has been responsible for the largest outbreak of rumor based geekgasms since word hit the internet of Chris Nolan taking on the Batman franchise. We’re apparently going to have a Superman+Batman movie.

Shocker.

Since the success of the Avengers, its really only been a matter of time before Marvels perennial rivals DC decided they’d quite like a piece of that pie. That sweet sweet greenback pie with a rich buttery dollar crust topped off with some freshly whipped cash and garnished with a few fresh Benjamins.

Unknown

The E.L. James School of Writing Money Synonym Award

Now the Avengers has made a certain few executives and shareholders quite fat, gorging themselves on a fair few helping of said Pie, and DC have a slightly smaller pie in the form of Batman (lets call it a tart because who doesn’t like the idea of calling the caped crusader a tart?) and what can only be describes as a biscuit in the disappointing return of the Big Blue Boy Scout in Man of Steel. So they’re hoping that buy lumping their products together, they can hit some similar success.

money-pie2-by-dz

mmm… pie.

But it wont work. And here’s why.

The Avengers are awesome. This is a fact. Lets break the team down shall we:

Captain America:

The cap is the undisputed leader of the avengers. He’s a do-gooder with a strong sense of loyalty and duty. He wasn’t born with super-powers, but he damn sure earnt them through being a genuinely great human being. He he doesn’t have the toys of Tony Stark or the raging psychotic monster of Bruce Banner but he’s got it where ti counts. The other thing about the Cap; the boy is messed. up. He thought he was dead. He wakes up in a future he doesn’t understand. All his friends are old or dead, (or brainwashed super assassins). The war he was created for is over and he has no idea what to do with his life. Dude has issues.

ultimatecapfrance658

Iron Man:

Genius billionaire playboy philanthropist Tony Stark, who is wracked with guilt over providing the means for people to ruin other peoples days for his entire life has a REALLY bad business trip and builds himself a life-support machine that also doubles up as perhaps the greatest weapon on the planet. He then decides to even out his karma a bit. Tony Stark is awesome. Not only does he have NONE of the usual superhero humility, but he has NONE of the usual superhero powers. He just has some epic toys and some really good connections. Did we mention he’s pretty messed up too? Yeah. Guilt+Giant ego = liability.

Demon-In-A-Bottle

Sabbath never recorded ‘Captain Drinkypants’. More to the pity…

The Hulk:

Bruce Banner gets mad. You don’t want that to happen. Banner is a bit screwed up too as a messed up experiment has turned him into a giant radioactive green rage monster that nothing save a god-like being from another realm can stop.

Thor:

God-Like being from another realm. (Adopted brother from an icy hell, an ego that took a MASSIVE pounding when he realised he was nothing without his weapon (ahem) and a girlfriend whom he barely sees.)

images

“And who’s going to clean this up” – Frigga

Black Widow:

She’s got some dark stuff in her past. She’s pretty screwed up inside. she’s also a master manipulator, an amazing spy, and a weapons expert on many levels.

Hawkeye:

Pretty much the above minus boobs and with a bow and arrow. Neither of these two guys are rocking superpowers, they’ve just practiced shooting things. A lot.

Nick Fury:

Shady dude. Lost an eye. Don’t take no crap. Bossman with dubious motives.

See, the thing about the Avengers as they all need each other. When you have a massive threat that requires ‘earths mightiest heroes’ to step in, they really do all need to work together. Consider Hulk, he needs Thore because nobody else can go toe to toe with him to chill him out. Iron Man needs Cap. to quell his ego and think things through.

You need a team of superheroes here because one on his/her own is genuinely not enough.

 

Skip to the Justice League.

DC only have one hero with flaws and qualities along the line of the above team: Batman. Batman is Banners angst with Starks money and toys, Hawkeye and Black widows anal attention to perfecting martial arts (and fondness for black PVC) and Nick Fury’s often dubious crossing of lines.

GalleryComics_1900x900_20140205_BM_BLKWHT_Cv6_52cf3157d7d184.17703957

nanananananananananana….wtf?

Batman is just a man in a suit. He’s got nothing other than a lot of rage and a lot more cash. So he’s vulnerable. This is why he’s awesome. The audience can relate to Batsy, he can get hurt and get hurt bad. He can, and often does, fail. He is by no means perfect. This is why The Dark Knight films were such a success. Batman is an accessible super hero.

Superman is not. Superman is a giant cop-out on the part of DC. Superman can’t really be injured, doesn’t get tired, can fly, has incredible strength, heat rays, ice breath, super hearing, travels at the speed of light so can get literally ANYWHERE on earth in a few seconds. He has all of the combined skills of the avengers and NONE of their weaknesses, save for a little green rock that ANY normal human could just MOVE OUT OF THE WAY. So why does Supes need a team? And who else do we have to join it?

Wonder Woman:

Superman with boobs. And an invisible plane.

Martian manhunter:

Superman but purple.

Aquaman:

Superman as long as he is wet. Ahem…

 

images-1

Fabulous.

None of these characters need the other members of the team, save Aquaman who would presumably need a guy following him with a supersoaker if her were to save somewhere like New York.

DC’s Heroes function best as loners. They do their thing and they don’t need any help doing it. Put them together and they will pretty much just get in each others ways. That or the whole movie will be over in about 5 minutes.

 

Justice League Film:

Random Citizen: “Oh no a horrible bad guy none of us have ever seen the likes of before, you’ll never manage this on your own Superman’

Supes: “yes i can”

Other Randomer: *breaks 4th wall “But superman, all of these people have paid good money to see you with some other heroes”

Supes: FFS, hand on, *makes bat signal in air with heat ray*

Batman: ‘sup?

Supes: Reckon you can maybe poke this thing with a stick so people think you’ve helped me kill it?

Batman: No, im not your bitch. I’m Batman.

Citizen: *something dramatic happens near a dam* Oh no, its causing a flood!

Aquaman: Hey you guys.

Superman: Groan

Batman: Get lost waterboy.

Wonderwoman: There has not been one female character in this film yet. Btw have you all seen how gratuitously skimpy my costume is?

 

wonder-woman-comics-costume

Illustrators want to make it obvious she doesn’t need any kind of support.

Superman: *blushes*

Batman: Got that costume in black leather?

Monster: Grawrareroarargh

Superman: Oh yeah, my bad. * kills monster*

THE END

 

Seriously, if they do a Justice League film, i’m willing to bet that will be the basic plot. Superman is heroic, batman is moody, aqua man is shite and wonder woman is the token pretty girl that looks good on posters and sells it ‘for the dads’ (do NOT get me started on female comic book characters)

So they’ve decided to team up their biggest cash cow (cash-bat?) and their most popular take on invincible super-powered hero for a comic book take on Bad Boyz?

Lets think about how that might go.

 

Batman + Superman Film

Villain: Haha i will destroy you all

Superman: No you wont

Villain: But i will leave this kryptonite here in the room with you you wont be able to make whilst i carry out my dastardly scheme.

Superman: crap

Villain: hahahah *runs off*

Superman: *picks up nearby phone* Hey Bruce, i need a favour

Batman: *arrives 5 mins later* ‘sup?

Superman: hey. look. you see that glowing green rock? could you be a pal and pop it in a lead box for me? I’m in a bit of a fix here.

Batman: Why? I’m still ok.

*lengthy discussion about morality and the greater good*

Batman: oh ok then you big blue boy scout can i at least put it in a bat shaped box?

Superman: sure

Batman: and then paint the box black and maybe bury it in a cave full of bats in a bat shaped safe just incase you go all evil and i have to fly in my bat shaped plane with the rock on the end to weaken you.

 

090611_batcave_batmanrobin

Betcha these are making much more sense now…

Superman: FFS Bruce, drop the freaky bat fetish crap and get rid of the goddamn rock. I am literally dying you freaky ass bastard!

Batman: I’m not a freak. i’m batman. *strokes pvc bat symbol on chest*

*throws bat-lassoo at rock*

Superman: Thanks weirdo.

*flies off and kills big boss*

The End

Thats.
About.
It.

The only reason Batman need feature in the film is to get rid of kryptonite and darken the colour palette a bit.

Which brings me to the real reason they are proposing this film: Batman is extremely popular and people enjoy his film. People flocked to see Man of Steel only to feel ripped off and disappointed by a movie that included such gaffs as:

Why did clark not rescue the dog?

How come he is going incognito but seems to be at the centre of a but load of crises?

How come all of the people he saves in said crises, when presented with proof of a superpowered alien seem to forget it and move on with their lives?

How come clark doesn’t just fly out to space, meet Zod in the ship and then fight there, rather than causing a whole heap of collateral damage and killing many, many people in the process?

How the fudge fuck can you make a ‘realistic’ Nolanised film about a GODDAMN SUPERPOWERED ALIEN?

etc.

Batman + Superman is only there to legitimatize the glaring flaws of Man of Steel. Will it work? Doubtful. Superman single handedly ruins everything that was good about the Dark Knight films by existing (there are no superheroes in Nolan’s Gotham) and Batman goes against everything superman believes in (and Superman could crush him like a doodlebug)

So yeah. There you go. DC has one good superhero, and the only reason he is any good is because he is essentially a marvel hero.

Batman is essentially Daredevil + Punisher + Iron Man

Superman is just too powerful, too flawless and too nice to enable any kind of emotional connection on the part of the audience. Thats why there really hasn’t ever been a good superman film (yeah Christopher Reeve yadah yadha, but are your memories of those films flawed by the media hype of the “You’ll believe a man can fly”?)

They are Polar opposites. and the only thing that will happen by putting them together is a DC remake of Tango and Cash. With black PVC. And bats. And an alien in blue tights

316452

Unless Bruce feeds Clark a kryptonite sandwich. You know. For funsies.[polldaddy poll=8015629]

Prove me wrong DC/Snyder. Please.